Friday, June 09, 2006
collect cash-
pretty much what cnbc&cramer,bulls are saying:(What's Happening Right Now...)
this is what happened in the past...Livermore was right..what happens in the past will happen over and over again..Of that I am sure.
"NARRATOR: On September 5th, economist Roger Babson gave a speech to a group of businessmen. "Sooner or later, a crash is coming and it may be terrific." He'd been saying the same thing for two years, but now, for some reason, investors were listening. The market took a severe dip. They called it the "Babson Break." The next day, prices stabilized, but several days later, they began to drift lower. Though investors had no way of knowing it, the collapse had already begun.
In the weeks to follow, the market fluctuated wildly up and down. On September 12th, prices dropped ten percent. They dipped sharply again in the 20s. Stock markets around the world were falling, too. Then, on September 25th, the market suddenly rallied.
REUBEN L. CAIN, Stock Salesman, 1929: I remember well that I thought, "Why is this doing this?" And then I thought, "Well, I'm new here and these people" -- like every day in the paper, Charlie Mitchell would have something to say, the J.P. Morgan people would have something to say about how good things were -- and I thought, "Well, they know a lot more about this market than I do. I'm fairly new here and I really can't see why it's going up." But then, when they say it can't go down or if it does go down today, it'll go back tomorrow, you think, "Well, they really are like God. They know it all and it must be the way it's going because they say so."
NARRATOR: As the market floundered, financial leaders were as optimistic as ever, more so. Just five days before the crash, Thomas Lamont, acting head of the highly conservative Morgan Bank, wrote a letter to President Hoover. "The future appears brilliant. Our securities are the most desirable in the world." Charles Mitchell assured nervous investors that things had never been better."
thats why the world bankers etc would rather sacrifice the economy before the economy sacrifices the bankers.-----it may be too late,
Re: foreclusre link
by: roachmotel66 06/09/06 03:22 pm
Msg: 212785 of 212787
Florida looks good,forclosures 2k preforclosures 28k....tic,tic,tic
(THATS 1400% RATE INCREASE WAITING TO HAPPEN)
http://www.foreclosure.com/ i was suprised at the number in my neck of the woods,
http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=20 06-05-19T134503Z_01_N19449901_RTRIDST_0_FINANCIAL-BASEL.XML
US FDIC - Basel II safeguards not too restrictive
Fri May 19, 2006 9:45 AM ET
Printer Friendly | Email Article | Reprints | RSS (Page 1 of 2)
CHICAGO, May 19 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators should be careful and prudent in managing capital in the bank system because they should not assume economic conditions will continue to be benign, the acting chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said on Friday.
Martin Gruenberg, speaking to the Conference of State Bank Supervisors in Norfolk, Virginia, said safeguards proposed by regulatory agencies to control how much capital can decline under new international standards were not unduly restrictive.
"We should keep in mind that the United States has enjoyed an unusual period of sustained economic growth with only a mild recession over the past decade," Gruenberg said, according to a copy of his prepared remarks.
"It would be a mistake to take for granted that the next 10 years will be equally benign. We should be cautious and prudent in making changes to our system of bank capital," he said.
U.S. bank regulators have proposed rules to guide the domestic implementation of an international capital accord known as Basel II.
The draft rules aim to ensure banks maintain prudent capital cushions by slowing down and setting more conservative steps for U.S. adoption of the agreement.
Specifically, the proposal sets out safeguards that require continual regulatory review and a multiyear transition that includes capital floors to keep capital from declining too quickly or too far.
Gruenberg said that among regulators' objectives in the proposed regulations, they sought to broadly maintain the overall level of risk-based capital requirements and set a 10 percent downward limit on the aggregate reduction allowed in minimum risk-based capital.
The rules also aim to create a level playing field between institutions that adopt the Basel II rules and those that do not, among other things.
"This is a critically important point, in my view," Gruenberg said.
"Basel II should not tilt the playing field toward either group. The (proposed rule) makes clear that the agencies will be prepared to make fundamental changes in the framework, if necessary, to address this issue," he said.
The proposal was announced by the Federal Reserve in March. It is now being reviewed by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, which is required for two bank regulatory agencies -- the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- because they are part of the U.S. Treasury Department.
It is the second attempt at draft rules by the bank regulators and comes after a test-run of the standards yielded a surprising drop in capital at U.S. banks. That pushed Congress to call for a re-evaluation and led regulators to delay implementation even though banks elsewhere in the world moved ahead.
Basel II updates 1988 standards. If adopted in the United States, the rules would be phased in between 2008 and 2011 at the earliest.
They are intended to align bank capital standards around the world and prevent a financial crisis in one corner of the globe from spreading. At the same time, they seek to recognize that different assets pose different risks, and that banks should be allowed to hold less capital for less risky assets.
Only the largest internationally active U.S. banks are expected to adopt the new rules.
© Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.
for those with a bias to religion-(lots of them out there,, dont laugh,, too many posters noted 6-6-6):
http://www.revelation13.net/KingJames9a.html
this is what happened in the past...Livermore was right..what happens in the past will happen over and over again..Of that I am sure.
"NARRATOR: On September 5th, economist Roger Babson gave a speech to a group of businessmen. "Sooner or later, a crash is coming and it may be terrific." He'd been saying the same thing for two years, but now, for some reason, investors were listening. The market took a severe dip. They called it the "Babson Break." The next day, prices stabilized, but several days later, they began to drift lower. Though investors had no way of knowing it, the collapse had already begun.
In the weeks to follow, the market fluctuated wildly up and down. On September 12th, prices dropped ten percent. They dipped sharply again in the 20s. Stock markets around the world were falling, too. Then, on September 25th, the market suddenly rallied.
REUBEN L. CAIN, Stock Salesman, 1929: I remember well that I thought, "Why is this doing this?" And then I thought, "Well, I'm new here and these people" -- like every day in the paper, Charlie Mitchell would have something to say, the J.P. Morgan people would have something to say about how good things were -- and I thought, "Well, they know a lot more about this market than I do. I'm fairly new here and I really can't see why it's going up." But then, when they say it can't go down or if it does go down today, it'll go back tomorrow, you think, "Well, they really are like God. They know it all and it must be the way it's going because they say so."
NARRATOR: As the market floundered, financial leaders were as optimistic as ever, more so. Just five days before the crash, Thomas Lamont, acting head of the highly conservative Morgan Bank, wrote a letter to President Hoover. "The future appears brilliant. Our securities are the most desirable in the world." Charles Mitchell assured nervous investors that things had never been better."
thats why the world bankers etc would rather sacrifice the economy before the economy sacrifices the bankers.-----it may be too late,
Re: foreclusre link
by: roachmotel66 06/09/06 03:22 pm
Msg: 212785 of 212787
Florida looks good,forclosures 2k preforclosures 28k....tic,tic,tic
(THATS 1400% RATE INCREASE WAITING TO HAPPEN)
http://www.foreclosure.com/ i was suprised at the number in my neck of the woods,
http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=20 06-05-19T134503Z_01_N19449901_RTRIDST_0_FINANCIAL-BASEL.XML
US FDIC - Basel II safeguards not too restrictive
Fri May 19, 2006 9:45 AM ET
Printer Friendly | Email Article | Reprints | RSS (Page 1 of 2)
CHICAGO, May 19 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators should be careful and prudent in managing capital in the bank system because they should not assume economic conditions will continue to be benign, the acting chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said on Friday.
Martin Gruenberg, speaking to the Conference of State Bank Supervisors in Norfolk, Virginia, said safeguards proposed by regulatory agencies to control how much capital can decline under new international standards were not unduly restrictive.
"We should keep in mind that the United States has enjoyed an unusual period of sustained economic growth with only a mild recession over the past decade," Gruenberg said, according to a copy of his prepared remarks.
"It would be a mistake to take for granted that the next 10 years will be equally benign. We should be cautious and prudent in making changes to our system of bank capital," he said.
U.S. bank regulators have proposed rules to guide the domestic implementation of an international capital accord known as Basel II.
The draft rules aim to ensure banks maintain prudent capital cushions by slowing down and setting more conservative steps for U.S. adoption of the agreement.
Specifically, the proposal sets out safeguards that require continual regulatory review and a multiyear transition that includes capital floors to keep capital from declining too quickly or too far.
Gruenberg said that among regulators' objectives in the proposed regulations, they sought to broadly maintain the overall level of risk-based capital requirements and set a 10 percent downward limit on the aggregate reduction allowed in minimum risk-based capital.
The rules also aim to create a level playing field between institutions that adopt the Basel II rules and those that do not, among other things.
"This is a critically important point, in my view," Gruenberg said.
"Basel II should not tilt the playing field toward either group. The (proposed rule) makes clear that the agencies will be prepared to make fundamental changes in the framework, if necessary, to address this issue," he said.
The proposal was announced by the Federal Reserve in March. It is now being reviewed by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, which is required for two bank regulatory agencies -- the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- because they are part of the U.S. Treasury Department.
It is the second attempt at draft rules by the bank regulators and comes after a test-run of the standards yielded a surprising drop in capital at U.S. banks. That pushed Congress to call for a re-evaluation and led regulators to delay implementation even though banks elsewhere in the world moved ahead.
Basel II updates 1988 standards. If adopted in the United States, the rules would be phased in between 2008 and 2011 at the earliest.
They are intended to align bank capital standards around the world and prevent a financial crisis in one corner of the globe from spreading. At the same time, they seek to recognize that different assets pose different risks, and that banks should be allowed to hold less capital for less risky assets.
Only the largest internationally active U.S. banks are expected to adopt the new rules.
© Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.
for those with a bias to religion-(lots of them out there,, dont laugh,, too many posters noted 6-6-6):
http://www.revelation13.net/KingJames9a.html
# posted by tagthatstock @ 12:29 PM 
